Home / Editorial

Loqos Jurnal editorial

Psychology is not "how to become happy". It is how to take apart what your unhappiness is made of, and decide what to do about it.
Mission

We make a psychology portal where every article is written or reviewed by a practicing psychologist with at least seven years of clinical experience. This is not content marketing with ChatGPT copy and not a single coach's blog.

We do not promise to "change your life in thirty days". We promise clear, verified and careful language — without charlatanism, without esoterics, without blaming the reader for their pain.

Psychology does not replace therapy — it accompanies it. And helps you notice the moment when therapy is needed.

Team

Editorial team

Editor-in-chief · Clinical psychologist

Samir Aliyev

Clinical psychologist, 14 years of practice. Author of Russian-language guides on anxiety disorders.

Anxiety · Self-worth
Editor · Family psychologist

Aida Mammadova

Family psychologist, specialising in adult attachment. Lectures at the Baku Institute of Psychotherapy.

Relationships · Sleep
Author · Adolescent psychologist

Emil Rustamov

Adolescent psychologist, 8 years of work with school children aged 10–17. Runs a supervisory group for parents.

Children & teens
Author · CBT psychologist

Leyla Hasanova

Cognitive-behavioural psychologist. Works with burnout and workaholism in IT and media.

Burnout · Self-worth
Policy

Editorial policy

  1. Every text is reviewed by a psychologist

    All articles have one or two reviewers — practicing psychologists with verified professional accreditation.

  2. No ChatGPT copy

    AI may help with fact verification or editing. Texts are written by people with clinical experience, and we say so.

  3. Does not replace therapy

    Any article is an introduction to a topic, not a treatment. Every text has a moment where we say: from here, see a specialist.

  4. No sensationalism, no clickbait

    Psychological topics are sensitive. We do not use headlines like "10 signs your partner is an abuser" — that harms the reader.

  5. Source transparency

    We cite studies, flag sample-size caveats, and say where data is still incomplete.

  6. Support, not diagnosis

    The aim of our articles is to help the reader recognise their state and decide what to do about it. Not to attach a label.